Why Leaving a Job Can Feel Like Falling Into the Abyss

We can be completely ready for something new and still feel strange when it finally happens. The season ends, we leave our company, the project gets handed off, or we finally retire from the thing that has organized a huge part of our life. Maybe we even chose the timing of when it happens, and the pressure drops, our calendar opens up, and there’s finally less to do.

Then somehow we feel a little worse.

That can be confusing because the counterintuitive explanation is that we miss the work. Sometimes we probably do, but a role we had is rarely just the actual work itself. It can also be where we know who we are, where we belong, who expects us to show up, what we're getting better at, and what tomorrow is for. When we leave a job and the role goes away, those things don't always separate cleanly enough for us to know which one we're missing.

A Role Organizes More Than Our Time

Work identities can become part of how we understand ourselves, and research on career transitions treats identity change as a central part of moving between roles. That’s not to say a title defines us, or that everyone struggles when one disappears, but it’s often one of the most stable ways we answer a surprisingly large number of everyday questions without having to think very hard about them.

We know where to be on Monday, who we answer to, and which problems are ours. We have some sense of whether we're doing well, and other people recognize the role too, which makes it socially tangible in a way that can make us feel understood.

This becomes especially visible in retirement. Qualitative work on people leaving long-held careers finds that retirement can involve an extended period of identity adjustment rather than a clean switch from worker to retiree. The identities people already have outside work can matter tremendously because leaving one role is different when several other meaningful pieces of our lives are still intact.

Athletes can face an existential flavor of this. Competitive sport can organize training, goals, feedback, friendships, travel, status, daily routine, and a sense of self all wrapped up into a single title that we identify as. Reviews of athlete retirement repeatedly find changes in identity, social networks, routine, and sense of purpose showing up together after sport ends. We don't have to assume every retired athlete experiences all of these, but a loss is a loss no matter how many other “identities” they might have. When the schedule suddenly becomes empty, thinking "I miss competing" may be perfectly true without telling us whether we miss the competition, the teammates, the structure, the external expectations, the familiar version of ourselves, or some combination, which makes getting to the source of the feeling that much harder.

Why Being Needed Can Be Hard to Separate From Meaning

A key piece playing a role in the creation of this void is the feeling that our presence changes something. Before we moved on, a coach might’ve expected us, a teammate would notice if we were absent, or a client needed an answer by Thursday. Even when those demands become exhausting, they keep sending a basic signal that there's a place where our actions have consequences.

Research on meaning during retirement is still fairly fragmented, so there isn’t a single answer that explains the emotional drop. What studies show though is that meaning, purpose, identity, and adjustment are recurring parts of the transition, particularly when what we were doing had been a key source of them. The data also points out how much remains unresolved about which parts of meaning matter most and how they change over time.

Sports science gives us a little more to work with. In retired competitive athletes, loss of athletic identity has been associated with poorer adjustment due to lower perceived meaning in life and lower perceived control. Those studies help highlight why a voluntary ending can still have a psychological cost, even if it’s a slightly less severe version of if we were fired or forced out. We can remove a demand we wanted to remove and, at the same time, remove some of the structure through which life had felt coherent and consequential.

That combination probably helps explain why relief and loss don't cancel each other out, since they can be responses to different parts of the same change.

The People Around the Role Matter Too

Being an athlete, a manager, or a “whatever your title might be” isn't only a belief we hold about ourselves. There are teammates who treat us as one, just as the person who runs a team is recognized by the people who work in their department, include them in certain conversations, and expect certain things from them. That means losing the role can also change a set of relationships that had been reinforcing who we were every day.

Retirement research has found that maintaining existing group memberships and gaining new ones are associated with better adjustment. Similar findings show up in retired athletes, where keeping old groups or joining new communities has been linked with better life satisfaction and mental-health outcomes. Social support and belonging to more groups tended to track with better mental health, while a stronger and more exclusive identity often tracks with poorer outcomes during transitions.

This doesn't mean we need to replace one team with another immediately, and it definitely doesn't mean a larger social network fixes identity change. It does make the empty calendar look a little different though. Fewer meetings can also mean fewer chances to interact with the people who used to reflect a particular version of us back to ourselves.

Off-Season Gives Us a Smaller Version of the Same Problem

We don't have to retire to get a taste of this feeling.

An off-season or vacation can temporarily remove many of the same signals while leaving our identity intact. For athletes, training volume changes, the next competition moves farther away, the team may scatter, coaches check in less often, and the feedback loop becomes slower. Sometimes, a period designed for recovery can feel flatter or more worrisome than expected.

The same can happen after a product launch, graduation, a big race, or the end of any stretch where one role became unusually dominant in our life. There’s less demand, but the demand was also providing structure. There’s more freedom, but it’s freedom that asks us to decide what deserves our attention instead of having our role decide for us.

This is likely one reason why filling the empty space we feel immediately isn't always the same as resolving it. If what disappeared was mostly social connection, another solo goal won't reproduce it. If it was progression and feedback taking up space, a full social calendar may not touch it. If we miss the activity itself, then all of the identity analysis in the world doesn't make that preference less real. Sometimes several of these things will be true at once, making the process more complicated to overcome.

What Can Continue After Leaving a Job and a Role Ends

The research on identity change shows that adjustment doesn't seem to require wiping the old role and identity away. People can maintain parts of an identity while its formal version changes, and that identity becomes a core piece of their new version, just in a different form. We can leave a profession while keeping the skills, values, relationships, interests, and ways of seeing ourselves that grew inside it.

This framing can make the first stretch after a role ends a little easier to digest. We don't have to decide immediately whether leaving was a mistake, and we don't have to decide that the discomfort means we secretly want the whole role back.

The work stopped, but so did some combination of the schedule, the feedback, the group, the responsibility, the sense of progress, and the familiar identity attached to all of it. Over time, some of those pieces may turn out to be things we were glad to lose, some may already exist elsewhere, and some may be worth carrying forward in a different form.

References

1. Ibarra H, Wittman S, Smith K. Career Transition and Professional Identity: Dynamic Processes, Multiple Selves, and Nonlinear Trajectories. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2026;13:137-163. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-020924-071546

2. Bordia P, Read S, Bordia S. Retiring: Role identity processes in retirement transition. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2020;41:445-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2438

3. Voorheis P, Silver M, Consonni J. Adaptation to life after sport for retired athletes: A scoping review of existing reviews and programs. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(9):e0291683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291683

4. Haslam C, Lam BCP, Yang J, Steffens NK, Haslam SA, Cruwys T, Jetten J. When the final whistle blows: Social identity pathways support mental health and life satisfaction after retirement from competitive sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102049

5. Haslam C, Lam BCP, Ghafoori E, Steffens NK, Haslam SA, Bentley SV, Cruwys T, La Rue CJ. A longitudinal examination of the role of social identity in supporting health and well-being in retirement. Psychology and Aging. 2023;38(7):615-626. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000757

6. Wood RE, Pachana NA. The Role of Meaning in the Retirement Transition: Scoping Review. The Gerontologist. 2025;65(6):gnaf076. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf076