Rest Is a Skill: Why Stillness Feels Uncomfortable
- John Winston
- Apr 16
- 4 min read
Most people think they know how to rest. Close your laptop, skip a workout, maybe watch a movie or sleep in a bit. Physically, you’re still. Mentally, you’re not. Even in the moments meant for recovery, your system might still be bracing, analyzing, or quietly grinding in the background.
This is why true rest feels elusive for high performers. It’s not about inactivity. It’s about whether your nervous system actually downshifts, and for a lot of people—especially those used to high output—that downshift doesn’t come easily. Rest becomes another thing to try and optimize, instead of what it’s meant to be: a return to baseline.
It’s not a motivation problem. It’s a wiring problem, but the good news is wiring can be retrained.

Rest Is Not the Absence of Effort
We tend to define rest by what we’re not doing, but the absence of effort doesn’t automatically create restoration. The body and brain need permission to recalibrate. When that doesn’t happen, even restful activities can leave you feeling drained.
This has to do with how the nervous system assesses safety. If your internal state is still alert—worried about what you’re missing, anxious about performance, scanning for the next thing—your body stays in a low-grade stress response. Heart rate may drop, but cortisol remains elevated, HRV stays low, muscles don’t fully release, and the digestive system stays semi-locked.
These are all signs that rest is happening in form but not in function. You may be lying down, but your system is upright. Over time, this state creates diminishing returns. It takes more time to achieve less recovery. What looks like laziness or burnout is often just a body that’s been trying to downshift but can’t find the gear.
Why Stillness Feels Uncomfortable
For many high performers, stillness doesn’t feel restorative. It feels awkward, restless, boring, or sometimes even threatening. That’s not a personality trait—it’s a nervous system adaptation.
When your system gets used to fast-paced, high-stakes, or constantly stimulated environments, it normalizes activation. Over time, the brain begins to associate that activated state with safety. Slowing down, on the other hand, feels unfamiliar, and what’s unfamiliar often registers as unsafe.
This explains why some people get anxious on their days off or feel unsettled when they finally sit still. It’s not because they’re wired wrong. It’s because the nervous system hasn’t practiced downregulation often enough to trust it.
There’s also a layer of identity here. For a lot of high-functioning individuals, rest threatens the sense of self. If who you are is tied to output, progress, or hustle, then rest feels like regression. Even when the body wants to stop, the story in your head keeps the engine running.
The Physiological Difference Between Distraction and Recovery
Not all breaks are created equal. There’s a big difference between numbing out and rewiring. Scrolling through your phone may pass time, but it rarely helps your nervous system settle. The same goes for binge-watching or multitasking during downtime. These activities often stimulate the same neural circuits you’re trying to calm.
Real rest shows up in how the body responds. Your breath slows naturally, HRV increases, and muscle tension fades. There’s a noticeable sense of ease, sometimes even a quiet joy. This isn’t about doing nothing. It’s about creating space where the system can reset without needing to monitor or perform, and, once we understand why stillness feels uncomfortable, we gain power over it.
The parasympathetic nervous system—responsible for rest and digestion—needs specific inputs to engage fully. These include safety, warmth, and slowness. If your “rest” involves cognitive stress or sensory overload, those inputs never arrive. You might check out, but you never really check in.
This is why some people wake up tired or feel mentally scattered after hours of “downtime.” The body was paused, but the mind wasn’t. Without real downregulation, recovery becomes surface-level.
Recovery Requires Permission
This is where the psychology of rest comes in. Most high performers don’t rest poorly because they don’t know how. They rest poorly because they haven’t given themselves permission to stop. Deep down, rest still feels like a deviation—something that must be earned or justified.
That framing turns rest into a reward, not a requirement. It makes recovery conditional, and when your system sees it as optional, it never fully buys in.
The brain’s reward circuits are shaped by context. If you believe rest is necessary and valuable, your dopamine system will reflect that. If you believe it’s a detour from “real work,” it’ll quietly resist. This isn’t just psychological. It’s neurochemical. Belief shifts biology.
Performance without recovery leads to decline. Performance with incomplete recovery leads to stagnation. Performance that includes trust in rest allows the body to adapt fully, not just tread water. This is the foundation of long-term growth—not how hard you go, but how well you reset.
One Practice to Start Retraining the System
One of the most accessible ways to begin rewiring your response to rest is through structured, non-goal-oriented breathing. This isn’t about mastering breathwork. It’s about sending a signal to your system that stillness is safe.
Even just 3–5 minutes of relaxed nasal breathing, without a performance target or mental task attached, can begin to shift your baseline. The key is staying present to the feeling of the breath, not analyzing it, not optimizing it, just feeling it.
Studies show that slow, intentional breathing increases vagal tone, reduces threat reactivity, and improves emotional regulation. Over time, this shifts your nervous system’s default state. It begins to trust that downshifting doesn’t mean danger—it means home.
From that place, rest becomes easier, recovery becomes deeper, and performance rebounds faster. You’re no longer just stopping. You’re rewiring.
References
Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation. W. W. Norton & Company.
Thayer, J. F., Åhs, F., Fredrikson, M., Sollers III, J. J., & Wager, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(2), 747-756.
Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers. Henry Holt and Company.
Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655–666.
Lehrer, P., & Gevirtz, R. (2014). Heart rate variability biofeedback: How and why does it work? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 756.
Pennebaker, J. W., & Smyth, J. M. (2016). Opening Up by Writing It Down: How Expressive Writing Improves Health and Eases Emotional Pain. Guilford Press.
Comments